<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Which TV provides better contrast Samsung A950 LED LCD TV or Sony&#8217;s XBR8 LED LCD TV?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.ledtv-deals.com/led-lcd-tv/which-tv-provides-better-contrast-samsung-a950-led-lcd-tv-or-sonys-xbr8-led-lcd-tv/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.ledtv-deals.com/led-lcd-tv/which-tv-provides-better-contrast-samsung-a950-led-lcd-tv-or-sonys-xbr8-led-lcd-tv</link>
	<description>Updated daily with current products, reviews and what&#039;s new.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 27 Dec 2011 04:15:27 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Colorful L</title>
		<link>http://www.ledtv-deals.com/led-lcd-tv/which-tv-provides-better-contrast-samsung-a950-led-lcd-tv-or-sonys-xbr8-led-lcd-tv/comment-page-1#comment-5</link>
		<dc:creator>Colorful L</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Oct 2009 10:54:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ledtv-deals.com/led-lcd-tv/which-tv-provides-better-contrast-samsung-a950-led-lcd-tv-or-sonys-xbr8-led-lcd-tv#comment-5</guid>
		<description>Both come with almost same features.Same 1,000,000:1 dynamoc contrast ratio.Personally I prefer Samsung and I think it the best bang for your buck.Samsung LN55A950 have an excellent picture quality and cheaper than Sony for around $1500
http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B001DT0LSI?ie=UTF8&amp;tag=computer0bd-20&amp;linkCode=as2&amp;camp=1789&amp;creative=390957&amp;creativeASIN=B001DT0LSI

or try consider new LED from Samsung UN55B7000 - 55&quot; LCD TV.It come with thinner set 1.2&quot;,higher contrast ratio 3,000,000:1 and less power consumption.A bit more expensive than LN55A950.
http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B0021VIL5C?ie=UTF8&amp;tag=computer0bd-20&amp;linkCode=as2&amp;camp=1789&amp;creative=390957&amp;creativeASIN=B0021VIL5C&lt;br&gt;&lt;b&gt;References : &lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Both come with almost same features.Same 1,000,000:1 dynamoc contrast ratio.Personally I prefer Samsung and I think it the best bang for your buck.Samsung LN55A950 have an excellent picture quality and cheaper than Sony for around $1500<br />
<a href="http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B001DT0LSI?ie=UTF8&amp;tag=computer0bd-20&amp;linkCode=as2&amp;camp=1789&amp;creative=390957&amp;creativeASIN=B001DT0LSI" rel="nofollow">http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B001DT0LSI?ie=UTF8&amp;tag=computer0bd-20&amp;linkCode=as2&amp;camp=1789&amp;creative=390957&amp;creativeASIN=B001DT0LSI</a></p>
<p>or try consider new LED from Samsung UN55B7000 &#8211; 55&quot; LCD TV.It come with thinner set 1.2&quot;,higher contrast ratio 3,000,000:1 and less power consumption.A bit more expensive than LN55A950.<br />
<a href="http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B0021VIL5C?ie=UTF8&amp;tag=computer0bd-20&amp;linkCode=as2&amp;camp=1789&amp;creative=390957&amp;creativeASIN=B0021VIL5C" rel="nofollow">http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B0021VIL5C?ie=UTF8&amp;tag=computer0bd-20&amp;linkCode=as2&amp;camp=1789&amp;creative=390957&amp;creativeASIN=B0021VIL5C</a><br /><b>References : </b></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk
Page Caching using disk (enhanced) (user agent is rejected)

Served from: www.ledtv-deals.com @ 2012-02-08 14:23:00 -->
